March 2025 was an necessary month for dividend-focused traders, with the underlying indices for the three largest dividend ETFs within the U.S. present process their annual reconstitutions. Probably the most vital change was with the Schwab U.S. Dividend Fairness ETF (SCHD), the place vitality turned the most important sector, growing in weight to twenty.8% from 12.3% of the portfolio. Client staples elevated by 3.5% whereas SCHD’s weight in financials dropped by 8.7%.
Evaluating Sector Weights Throughout the 4 Largest U.S. Dividend ETFs
Monitoring adjustments in U.S.-listed dividend-focused ETFs is necessary since this class had $504 billion in property within the U.S. as of March 27, 2025. Moreover, they’ve already taken in $10.4 billion in web inflows this 12 months by that date, which may speed up as traders search security in an unsure setting.
Determine 1 compares the sector weights of the 4 largest dividend-focused ETFs within the U.S. relative to the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). All 4 dividend ETFs are chubby in well being care in comparison with IVV, which tracks the market benchmark S&P 500 index. SCHD stands out relative to the others because it has a 21% weight in vitality, considerably larger than different dividend ETFs and the 4% weight available in the market benchmark. It additionally has the next weight in client staples in comparison with the market and its ETF friends.
Against this, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG), and iShares Core Dividend Progress ETF (DGRO) are all chubby in financials relative to each the market and SCHD. These differentials in sector weights may lead to SCHD having very divergent returns in 2025 relative to its dividend ETF friends, relying on how totally different sectors carry out.
SCHD’s differentiated sector publicity was accentuated after its newest index reconstitution, which was efficient earlier than the market opened on March 24, 2025. Its vitality holdings elevated to 12 from seven shares, with the addition of names like ConocoPhillips, Halliburton and Ovintiv. The holdings in financials names decreased to 37 from 41, with the sector weight decreasing to eight.5% from 17.2%. The three largest monetary shares by weight in SCHD previous to the March reconstitution had been dropped—Blackrock, U.S. Bancorp and M&T Financial institution.
The rely of client staples shares in SCHD elevated to 10 from 5, with Goal, Common Mills and Archer-Daniels-Midland all being added. The rely of client discretionary shares in SCHD was decreased by 4, with Tapestry, Dick’s Sporting Items and H&R Block all being dropped through the reconstitution.
Implications of Dividend ETF Methodology Variations for Buyers
Understanding what drives the variations in publicity between the 4 largest dividend ETFs requires a better have a look at their methodologies and reconstitution schedules, which is summarized in Desk 2 under.
The 4 largest dividend ETFs within the U.S., whereas all listed, have totally different approaches to safety choice, weighting and index reconstitution. Buyers want to contemplate just a few necessary components when choosing between them.
-
Emphasis on dividend progress versus dividend yield: The ETF methodologies try and steadiness selecting between shares that pay or develop dividends commonly versus these with excessive dividend yields. VIG and DGRO are centered totally on historic dividend progress, with the previous even excluding shares with the best yields. Presumably it’s because companies with the best forecasted yields are additionally most susceptible to not sustaining dividend progress. In consequence, VIG has the bottom 12-month trailing distribution yield (1.84% as of March 27, 2025) of the 4 ETFs. Against this, VYM, the opposite massive Vanguard dividend ETF, makes use of solely forecasted dividend yield and doesn’t consider whether or not a agency has been an everyday dividend grower traditionally. This explains why its distribution yield is larger (2.89% as of March 27) than that of VIG and DGRO (2.26% as of the identical date).
-
Breadth of holdings: Though SCHD components in each common historic funds and indicated yield, it has the best yield (3.76% as of March 27, 2025) of the 4 ETFs. That is largely resulting from holding a most of 100 shares, which permits it to be extra concentrated in dividend-oriented shares. Whereas VYM components in solely forecasted yield in its methodology, because it holds half the market capitalization of the eligible universe, its give attention to dividend yield will get diluted by the breadth of its holdings. In consequence, as of March 27, 2025, VYM had a decrease trailing 12-month distribution yield than that of SCHD.
-
Sector weighting: Lastly, traders should additionally issue within the totally different sector weights, notably the excessive vitality publicity in SCHD after the March 2025 rebalance. Vitality shares presently have excessive indicated yields however traditionally have been inconsistent in sustaining dividends. This might doubtlessly put traders susceptible to cuts to dividends and for SCHD to outperform its friends, worth appreciation within the Vitality sector would have to be larger than in different sectors like Info Know-how and Financials.
Given the present market uncertainty pushed by tariffs and above goal inflation, we count on the already substantial asset base of $504 billion in U.S.-listed dividend ETFs to develop additional. Because the current index rebalance resulted in SCHD having a special sector publicity than its friends, traders might want to issue this and different methodology variations into their choice of dividend ETFs. The efficiency of the Vitality sector, in relation to Info Know-how and Financials, will decide which of those dividend ETFs outperform this 12 months.
