Jamie Golombek: Latest court docket case an vital reminder to ensure you’re snug with something you declare in your return
Evaluations and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by means of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Beneath our tax system in Canada, every particular person information his or her personal tax return and is taxed on the revenue they earn on a person foundation. The United States, however, permits the submitting of joint tax returns by which each spouses can pool their revenue on the identical return, with larger joint-tax brackets for the couple than for a single taxpayer.
Article content material
Article content material
There are, nevertheless, a number of locations on the Canadian tax return the place spouses or common-law companions have a possibility for tax planning by selecting on which return to assert sure revenue, bills or credit.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Maybe probably the most well-known alternative for spousal tax planning is the flexibility to separate eligible pension revenue along with your partner. Pension splitting means that you can save revenue tax the place one partner is in a decrease tax bracket upon retirement than the opposite, and might also assist you to protect income-tested authorities advantages and credit, reminiscent of your Previous Age Safety pension or the age credit score. To reap the advantages of pension splitting for 2024, each you and your partner should full Canada Income Company Type T1032, Joint Election to Break up Pension Revenue and file the kinds along with your tax returns.
One other alternative for tax financial savings between spouses is on the subject of claiming medical bills. For the 2024 return, you may declare medical bills in case your family’s whole eligible medical bills exceed the lesser of three per cent of your internet revenue, or $2,759. Consequently, it’s usually advisable to pool all of the household’s medical bills collectively and declare them on the lower-income partner’s tax return.
Lastly, on the subject of charitable donations, it’s typically finest to pool all donations on one partner’s return, as a result of there’s a decrease federal credit score of 15 per cent for the primary $200 of annual charitable donations. (Alberta taxpayers will be the exception owing to Alberta’s excessive provincial donation credit score of 60 per cent on the primary $200.) As well as, for high-income earners (revenue over $246,752 in 2024), the federal donation credit score price jumps to 33 per cent, that means that the high-income partner ought to typically declare donations if they’re the only real partner with revenue over that threshold.
High Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Nevertheless it’s vital to do not forget that for those who do select to assert a donation tax credit score in your return, even when the donation was made by your partner, you’re the one who’s in the end accountable ought to the CRA ever problem the validity of your donation. Take the latest case, determined earlier this month, of a taxpayer who went to federal court docket looking for a judicial overview of a call by the CRA denying her request for aid of arrears curiosity accruing since 2005 on a donation tax shelter bought by her now ex-husband.
The taxpayer’s troubles started again in 2005, when she claimed a tax credit score in respect of a $41,616 donation to the Canadian Humanitarian Belief (CHT). The donation was organized by her ex, though she claimed it on her personal tax return. The CHT was a donation tax shelter scheme by which hundreds of Canadians participated. Members made a money donation to the CHT, which then generated an in-kind donation that the individuals claimed on their tax returns. In 2005, the taxpayer’s money donation was $11,340 whereas the in-kind donation represented the distinction between this quantity and the $41,616 claimed on her tax return.
Commercial 4
Article content material
In June 2008, the CRA reassessed the taxpayer’s 2005 tax return, and denied the donation tax credit score in full. She was consequently reassessed for an extra quantity of $18,460 of tax owing, plus arrears curiosity. In December 2008, the taxpayer filed her first discover of objection. In February 2009, the CRA knowledgeable her that given the excessive variety of Canadians who had participated within the CHT tax shelter, her objection can be held in abeyance till a last judicial choice on the validity of those donations was rendered.
Quick ahead to February 2015, when the CRA suggested the taxpayer that her 2005 tax return can be reassessed to permit solely the money portion of the donation, and that the arrears curiosity can be adjusted accordingly. The CRA then supplied the taxpayer with two choices: she might both waive her objection or attraction rights and the CRA would cancel the curiosity for the in-kind portion of her donation, or she might pursue her objection, by which case arrears curiosity would proceed to accrue on her excellent steadiness. The letter additionally indicated that silence can be interpreted as choosing possibility two.
Commercial 5
Article content material
The taxpayer by no means responded to the CRA’s letter, and in July 2015, the taxpayer’s 2005 tax return was reassessed to permit solely the money portion of the donation, together with her excellent tax owing lowered to $13,551, plus arrears curiosity. The taxpayer once more objected, however her objection was held in abeyance pending a last choice in two lead take a look at instances regarding the validity of in-kind donations to the CHT.
Lastly, in Might 2020, the Federal Court docket of Attraction in the end dominated that the CHT was, the truth is, a donation tax shelter scheme, and disallowed claims for charitable tax credit for in-kind donations. In January 2021, the Supreme Court docket of Canada denied depart to attraction, thus formally ending the authorized journey.
The CRA then resumed processing objections regarding the reassessment of CHT donations and in June 2022 the taxpayer was issued a discover of affirmation that the in-kind donation of $30,318 was disallowed as a charitable donation. The CRA did conform to waive some arrears curiosity for 2020 due to the CRA’s response to the pandemic, and from a part of 2021 by means of 2022, due to the CRA’s delays in processing objections after the ultimate decision of the 2 take a look at instances.
Commercial 6
Article content material
The taxpayer objected and went to tax court docket. In February 2024, that court docket dismissed her attraction, figuring out that the taxpayer “couldn’t shift duty onto her ex-husband, as she claimed the donations on her 2005 tax returns and now she should reside with the results.”
The taxpayer, confronted with a big tax invoice and 20 years’ value of arrears curiosity, wrote to the CRA requesting curiosity aid. This was twice denied by the CRA, so the taxpayer went to federal court docket looking for a judicial overview of the CRA’s choice to not waive curiosity.
Earlier this month, the federal court docket decide dismissed the taxpayer’s case, discovering that the taxpayer “has not met her burden to show the unreasonableness of the (CRA’s) choice to disclaim her taxpayer aid.”
Really helpful from Editorial
The case serves as an vital reminder to all of us this tax season: ensure you’re snug with something you declare in your private return.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
If you happen to preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it is advisable to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
