For years, Apple has positioned itself as a champion of client privateness, setting itself other than its tech business friends Google and Fb and their ad-based enterprise fashions that depend on siphoning up as a lot consumer knowledge as doable.
“Privateness is a elementary human proper,” Apple CEO Tim Prepare dinner stated final 12 months, repeating a mantra he has made a central a part of Apple’s advertising and marketing technique.
However Apple’s privateness status is beginning to present some main cracks—resulting from mounting revelations about its profitable relationship with Google, which has been referred to as “the pioneer of surveillance capitalism.”
The U.S. authorities’s antitrust lawsuit in opposition to Google has produced some eye-popping numbers. In keeping with lately unsealed courtroom paperwork from the trial, Google paid Apple $20 billion in 2022 to make Google the default search engine on its Safari net browser. That’s up from a reported $18 billion fee in 2021. A Google witness on the trial testified that Google pays Apple 36% of the income it earns from search adverts on Safari.
The main points of those transactions, which each corporations had taken pains to maintain secret, do a lot to undermine Apple’s rhetoric about being a defender of consumer privateness. They lay naked how Apple, an organization that calls privateness a “core worth,” has been profiting handsomely from Google, recognized for its voracious assortment of private knowledge. (Google says it does its greatest to guard consumer knowledge.)
Removed from looking for to distance itself from Google within the wake of those revelations, Apple seems to be open to increasing the connection. In keeping with Bloomberg Information, Apple has held negotiations to make use of Google’s Gemini generative AI instruments to energy new options on the iPhone. The newest studies point out Apple could also be near a deal with OpenAI however continues to be speaking with Google. Apple is lagging behind different tech business gamers in growing generative AI, and such a deal can be a fast means for the corporate to leapfrog forward with the expertise.
Nonetheless, an AI partnership with Google would increase but extra questions on Apple’s dedication to privateness. A latest investigation by the New York Instances revealed that Google quietly revised its privateness coverage final 12 months in an obvious effort to develop the quantity of consumer knowledge accessible to coach its generative AI fashions—and launched the brand new language on the July 4 weekend to attenuate scrutiny of the modifications. By tapping into Google’s Gemini for the iPhone, Apple can be associating itself with these ways.
Whomever Apple finally ends up partnering with on AI, the corporate should be clear with its customers about the place their knowledge will go and the way it will likely be used. Apple cast its privateness status in 2016 throughout its high-profile standoff with the FBI over an iPhone utilized by one of many San Bernardino mass shooters. Apple famously refused the FBI’s request to unlock the gadget, warning it might create a “grasp key” that may break encryption and put the privateness and safety of tens of millions of Individuals in danger. Prepare dinner referred to as the case a “civil liberties” problem, placing privateness on the forefront of Apple’s company model.
Within the years since, Apple has taken necessary steps to guard privateness, together with options that require apps to get express permission from customers to trace their conduct and permit customers to activate end-to-end encryption for his or her messages and different knowledge saved in Apple’s iCloud. However Apple’s deep entanglement with Google casts a big and rising shadow over the corporate’s claims to be a privateness savior.
The truth that Apple is financially benefitting—to the tune of billions of {dollars}—from Google’s privacy-invasive search engine makes Apple advertising and marketing slogans like “What occurs in your iPhone, stays in your iPhone” ring hole. It additionally provides a definite odor of hypocrisy to Prepare dinner’s frequent jabs at tech business rivals over their data-hungry methods. At one 2015 occasion, the place the Apple CEO was feted as a “Champion of Freedom” by a privateness advocacy group, Prepare dinner took purpose at corporations which can be “gobbling up the whole lot they will find out about you and attempting to monetize it,” including that “it’s not the form of firm that Apple needs to be.”
Apple’s protection of the Google search deal principally boils right down to: It’s not good, however there’s no different possibility. Testifying on the Google antitrust trial, Apple government Eddy Cue, who negotiated the newest model of the search deal, stated there “wasn’t a sound different” to Google. In a 2018 interview, Prepare dinner stated Google’s search engine is “one of the best” and talked up Apple’s privateness settings for net shopping.
These feedback recommend that Apple had no alternative however to associate with Google. Nonetheless, you will need to observe that Apple’s relationship with Google goes past the search deal. Tech publication The Data reported in 2021 that Apple was the largest company shopper of Google’s cloud storage service. In keeping with the report, Apple “dramatically elevated” the quantity of consumer knowledge it saved in Google’s cloud that 12 months and was poised to spice up its spending on the service by 50%. The newest studies about Apple’s negotiations with Google over a possible AI deal recommend that Apple is prepared to take the partnership even additional. Apple’s prospects should know extra about how the corporate’s dealings with Google have an effect on the privateness of their knowledge, significantly in mild of Apple’s heavy advertising and marketing of itself as a privacy-minded company. It’s clear that regulators are now not taking Apple’s privateness guarantees at face worth. The Justice Division’s antitrust lawsuit in opposition to Apple, filed in March, observes that Apple “selectively compromises privateness and safety pursuits when doing so is in Apple’s personal monetary curiosity,” giving the Apple-Google search deal as a primary instance.
Katie Paul is the director of the Tech Transparency Mission.
Extra must-read commentary printed by Fortune:
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially replicate the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
